Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Ormaechea vs Tina Nadine Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ormaechea vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Ormaechea vs Tina Nadine Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ormaechea 0 - 0 Smith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ormaechea has won 45.7% of points on their second serve, while Smith has won 49.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ormaechea, in recent form, has won 58.3% of their opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 51.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.78% and 39.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ormaechea has saved 49.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 55.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ormaechea has won 40% of matches played (W/L 8/ 12), with Smith winning 57.95% (W/L 51/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ormaechea has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 362/ 202), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 23% (W/L 3/ 10). Smith has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 38/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Ormaechea has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 51/ 36). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ormaechea has played against opponents with an average rank of 351.6 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of 286.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ormaechea has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ormaechea has converted 50.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 44.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
843
Rank
59
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
329
Rank
325
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
60% (416-282)
Career Total W/L
56% (143-114)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
58% (26-19)
$403,418
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Ormaechea | Tina Nadine Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 58% (26/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (21/25) | 57% (61/46) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (198/208) | 53% (518/465) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (10/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (8/11) | 50% (8/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 99 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 142 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:49 | 1:46:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 361.58 | 264.24 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (827/1315) | 61% (1811/2971) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (449/827) | 65% (1184/1811) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (223/488) | 49% (569/1160) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (80/159) | 45% (162/364) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (607/1307) | 44% (1319/2993) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (8/10) | 59% (26/18) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 58% (26/45) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 47% (8/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 77% (30/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 23% (30/7) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 20% (15/3) |
Paula Ormaechea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Cristina Dinu
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Ormaechea
Player
Fiona Ganz
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
72 of
96)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Ormaechea
Player
Selena Janicijevic
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Paula Ormaechea
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
56%
(
73 of
130)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-0 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Paula Ormaechea
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Paula Ormaechea
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
39 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Ormaechea
Player
Eleonora Alvisi
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
45%
(
19 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
33 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tina Nadine Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Alice Gillan
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Jana Bojovic
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Carolina Kuhl
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Pia Lovric
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Weronika Falkowska
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Ormaechea Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ormaechea are available here and Smith photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
